The US Open
Sabalenka subdues dark flashbacks to reach second USO final

Aryna Sabalenka will try to go one step better than a year ago at the US Open as she faces Jessica Pegula in Saturday’s women’s final at the last major of the season,
The world No. 2 who lost the 2023 title match to Coco Gauff, will now face a test against another American after Pegula booked her spot with a 1-6, 6-4, 6-2 fightback over Czech Karolina Muchova.
Sabalenka moved through her semi-final with relative ease, defeating Emma Navarro of the US 6-3, 7-6 (2) but still had to grapple with outbursts from a pro-home crowd.
“That was a very difficult match,” Sabalenka said. “At the end of the second set I got a little emotional and had this little flashback (on a hostile crowd atmosphere) on last year’s final.
“I’m really glad for the lessons learned; I was able to control my emotions and close this match in two sets.”
She added: “With a sizable proportion of the notoriously rowdy New York fans cheering the home player – daughter of a hedge fund billionaire – Sabalenka had to submerge dark memories of poor form by the public from her loss to Gauff 12 months ago.
“Today wasn’t that crazy, actually. They (crowd) were loud, but during the point they were respectful and chill.
“Last year they were just super loud, even during the point. It was so loud, (that) it was blocking my ears… so much pressure.
“Today I was, like, No, no, no, Aryna, it’s not going to happen again. You have to control your emotions. You have to focus on yourself.
“There were people supporting me. I was trying to focus on them.
“I’m thinking, come on, there are so many people supporting you. There is your team in the box. There is your family. Just focus on yourself and just fight for it.”
Sabalenka produced her win in 93 minutes, hitting 34 aces and the same number of winners. Navarro went 13/13 while breaking the double Australian Open winner twice.
“I had really tough lessons here in the past, (and) so many opportunities that I didn’t use it for different reasons.
“I wasn’t ready. Then I got emotional. Then I just couldn’t handle the (2023) crowd.
“But every time I’m coming back here, I have this positive thinking; every time I’m hoping that one day I’ll be able to hold that beautiful trophy.”
The final will be a repeat of last month’s Cincinnati title match won by Sabalenka over Pegula, who will be competing in her first Grand Slam final.
Sabalenka,who missed the Olympics after picking up a shoulder injury at Wimbledon, admitted that being forced to lighten her summer playing load might have helped her at Flushing Meadows.
“I decided to sacrifice the Olympics for the hard court season – I have no regrets on that decision.
“It looks like it was the right one. We had a little camp before the hard court season. I was able to reset my mind and clean my thoughts and starteverything from the beginning.”
In the second semi, Pegula had to turn her match around after trailing 6-1, 2-0 against Muchova. one of the revelations of the fortnight as she makes a return from injury.
The 30-year-old American – also from a billionaire, pro sports team-owning family, began her fightback to become the oldest American woman to play her first Grand Slam final.
The New Yorker ran to the final after spring injuries which forced her from four 1000-level tournaments as well as Roland Garros.
But last month she won the Toronto title and lost the Cincinnati final to Sabalenka.
The winner of 15 of her last 16 matches was thrilled with her showing:
“That was quite the match,” Pegula said. “Obviously I’m happy to be here saying that I turned it around, but it was looking a little rough there for a while.
“Somehow I found a way and was actually able to play some really good tennis and keep that momentum through that third set and close it out.
“We had some really good tennis at the end of the second and into the third. I’m just happy with the way I was able to compete.”
Pegula said that holding serve for 1-2 in the second set and saving a break point helped her start reversing the momentum.
“The crowd really helped me get some adrenaline into me. I was just very, very flat. I wasn’t even nervous. I was just super flat, and she’s really tough to play when you’re flat.”
Pegula called her finals berth “amazing, a childhood dream. It’s what I wanted when I was a kid.”
She added: “I’m just happy to be in a final, but obviously I come here wanting to win the title.
“If you would have told me at the beginning of the year I’d be in the finals of the US Open, I would have laughed so hard, because that just was where my head
was, thinking that I would be here.
“To overcome all those challenges and say that I get a chance at the title Saturday is what we play for.
“To be able to do that in my home country here, in my home slam.. it’s perfect, really.”
Indian wells
Sabalenka wins Miami with 3rd defeat of Pegula

Aryna Sabalenka shook off a one-hours rain delay as she defeated Jessica Pegula for the third time in a row, winning the Miami Masters on Saturday 7-5, 6-2.
The world No. 1 kept a firm grip on the top ranking spot after dismissing her American opponent after finals wins over Pegula in Cincinnati and New York last season.
Victory in just under 90 minutes was the second title of the season for Sabalenka, who lost 2025 finals at the Australian Open and earlier this month at Indian Wells to teenaged Mirra Andreeva.
The final began an hour late due to rain in South Florida.
Sabalenka broke on six of her 14 chances while dropping her own serve four times.
Sabalenka finally lifted the trophy here on her seventh appearance after reaching quarter-finals in 2021 and 2023.
The winner claimed her eighth title at the 1000 level while improving her record over Pegula to 7-2.
Sabalenka owns 19 career trophies including back-to-back Australian Opens and the US Open last September.
ATP
See you in court: Players file suit against ATP

The ATP is facing a class-action lawsuit spearheaded by 12 players as Novak Djokovic’s union goes to war with the sanctioning body.
The Professional Tennis Players Association will drag tine ATP into the American legal process over what the PTPA labels as a “cartel”
Also included in the action are the women’s WTA, the Grand Slam umbrella body the International Tennis Federation and the sport’s antidoping bosses at the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA).
The 163-page complaint filed in New York is also being mooted in the EU and the UK, home of Wimbledon.
Complaints by players include issues such as prize money, the rankings system and schedule, the ITIA investigative practices and also complain about (mainly lower-ranking) players being deprived of ancillary and marketing income which they deserve.
With major stars of the game earning tens of millions per season – including sponsorship monies – the little people represented by the PTPA have been feeling left out for years.
The PTPA got its start in 2022 spearheaded by Canadian Vasek Popspil and former world No. 1 Djokovic.
The current lawsuit includes controversial Aussie Nick Kyrgios as a plaintiff, with the legal action seeking an American jury trial.
“Tennis is broken,” PTPA executive director Ahmad Nassar said. “Behind the glamorous veneer that the Defendants promote, players are trapped in an unfair system that exploits their talent, suppresses their earnings, and jeopardizes their health and safety.
“We have exhausted all options for reform through dialogue, and the governing bodies have left us no choice but to seek accountability through the courts. Fixing these systemic failures isn’t about disrupting tennis – it’s about saving it for the generations of players and fans to come.”
The ATP has rejected the claims and said they are ready for a legal battle, saying the action “to be entirely without merit.”
“Throughout more than three decades, ATP’s 50-50 governance structure has ensured that players and tournaments have an equal voice in shaping the sport’s direction at the highest level.”
The sanctioning body points to a USD 70 million prize money and player payout revenue over the last five years, with the ATP suggesting it is taking care of minor players with its reforms.
The WTA also jumped in with a statement on the “misguided” lawsuit while antidoping also protested their innocence.
Pospisil said the battle for better pay has only begun, with accusations that the ATP and its partner tournament conspire to cap prize money to keep a larger share for themselves..
The PTPA also complained about playing conditions including extreme heat and 3 a.m. match finishes in front of near-empty stands – most notably at the US and Australian Opens, the major offenders.
The suit says tennis players receive only 17 percent of tournament revenues whereas in other sports – read gold – the split is closer to 35-50 percent.
“This is about fairness, safety, and basic human dignity,” Pospisil said in a statement.
“I’m one of the more fortunate players and I’ve still had to sleep in my car when travelling to matches early on in my career – imagine an NFL player being told that he had to sleep in his car at an away game.”
He added, “It’s absurd and would never happen, obviously. No other major sport treats its athletes this way. The governing bodies force us into unfair contracts, impose inhumane schedules, and punish us for speaking out.”
Main photo:- Executive Director Ahmad Nassar and Head of PTPA Global Services Tarik Koubaa – ©PTPA
ATP
Holders slam USO mixed dubs kick in the gut

The reigning US Open mixed doubles champions are kicked off the pushback over a plan by the Grand Slam to gut their event and reduce it to just two days for the upcoming summer edition.
Italian holders Andrea Vavassori and Sara Errani slammed the move by organisers, saying the plan to halve the field to a bare-minimum 16 teams and stage the competition over a couple of days prior to the actual start of the Open during qualifying rounds is a giant slap in the face to players.
The controversial plan has been labelled a “money grab” and has so far faced universal condemnation in the tennis world, with players and coaches not even consulted.
Vavassori and Erani let loose in a statement:
“In our opinion making decisions just following the logic of profit is profoundly wrong in some situations.
“Last year, to win the US Open together was one of the greatest moments in our careers. We felt unbelievable warmth and support from the Italian fans and that made us really happy.
“Mixed doubles is not very well known, that’s true, but everything that’s part of a Slam competition – the history behind every single result – is unique and it’s a great honour to become part of it.
But the Italian pair are not the only players complaining.
France’s three-time mixed Grand Slam winner Kristina Mladenovic called the
move “terribly shocking news.”
.“Doing that just to sell more money during the first week of the event. Making it look like an exhibition for whoever wants to play!,“ she posted on social media.
“Coming back the following year and seeing your names engraved in the trophy board is one of the most special feelings in our sport. You realise that you will forever be remembered as a small part of this important tournament.”
In addition to trivialising the event, some rules will also be changed by New York bosses.
Instead of a decisive third set, matches will be determined by a first-to-10-point tiebreak; prize money, though, has been increased from USD 200,000 to 1 million by way of some compensation
Main photo:- Kristina Mladenovic unhappy at USTA’s Mixed Doubles plans.
-
Dubai3 weeks ago
Kasatkina confirms move to Australia
-
ATP4 weeks ago
Henman joins Team Europe as Noah’s assistant
-
ATP4 weeks ago
Dimitrov casts his spell on Khachanov
-
Rouen5 days ago
Dart apologizes for “stinky” opponent jibe
-
Miami Open4 weeks ago
Paolini powers past Osaka in Miami
-
ATP3 weeks ago
Badosa aims for back injury return by Madrid
-
Miami Open4 weeks ago
Raducanu set for huge rankings boost after Miami Open win
-
Miami Open4 weeks ago
Philippine teen swats Swiatek in Miami